HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
x1xhlol
system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
Developer Tools2025–2026
x1xhlol / system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools

system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools

FULL Augment Code, Claude Code, Cluely, CodeBuddy, Comet, Cursor, Devin AI, Junie, Kiro, Leap.new, Lovable, Manus, NotionAI, Orchids.app, Perplexity, Poke, Qoder, Replit, Same.dev, Trae, Traycer AI, VSCode Agent, Warp.dev, Windsurf, Xcode, Z.ai Code, Dia & v0. (And other Open Sourced) System Prompts, Internal Tools & AI Models

15Distinct people
18Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
144.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

FULL Augment Code, Claude Code, Cluely, CodeBuddy, Comet, Cursor, Devin AI, Junie, Kiro, Leap.new, Lovable, Manus, NotionAI, Orchids.app, Perplexity, Poke, Qoder, Replit, Same.dev, Trae, Traycer AI, VSCode Agent, Warp.dev, Windsurf, Xcode, Z.ai Code, Dia & v0. (And other Open Sourced) System Prompts, Internal Tools & AI Models

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-03-15 05:37:28 UTC to 2026-07-30 21:11:26 UTC.

01232025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 20252025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 3 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsNov 20252025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 2026

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 20252025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Apr 20252025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC330
May 20252025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC312
Jun 20252025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC312
Jul 20252025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Aug 20252025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20252025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Oct 20252025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Nov 20252025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Dec 20252025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20262026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20262026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 20262026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20262026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20262026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20262026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20262026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

18 sources
This repo [1] is a brilliant illustration of the copium going into this. Third line of the Claude prompt [2]: IMPORTANT: You must NEVER generate or guess URLs for the user - Who knew solving LLM hallucinations was just that easy? IMPORTANT: DO NOT ADD ***ANY*** COMMENTS unless asked - Guess we need triple bold to make it pay attention now? It gets even more ludicrous when you see the recommendation that you should use a LLM to write this slop of a .cursorrules file for you. [1]: https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-t... [2]: https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-t...
In Why the push for Agentic when models can barely follow a simple instruction?
you can - but they dont work reliably in practice. Common issues include search match fails, missing commas in replaced items (model doesnt have surround context while replacing), and a few other error cases. This issues are much worse for scattered edits across a file from real world queries (ex: make this page look nicer). Patches tend to work fine for single line or extremely focused edits though - Cursor uses s&r/patches for single line edits: https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-t...
In Launch HN: Morph (YC S23) – Apply AI code edits at 4,500 tokens/sec
> 2.3 Specialized Micro-Agents Over Generalized Rules Initially, our instinct was to continuously add more rules into a single large prompt to handle edge cases This has been my experience as well. However, it seems like the platforms like Cursor/Lovable/v0/et al are doing things differently For example, this is Lovable’s leaked system prompt, 1550 lines: https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-t... Is there a trick to making gigantic system prompts work well?
In Learnings from building AI agents

Showing the 15 most recent of 18 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.