may_minihttp

After investigating may_minihttp[0], which appears, for now, to be the fastest web framework on TechEmpower benchmarks[1], I saw the data below. [0]: https://github.com/Xudong-Huang/may_minihttp [1]: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r23 == tokio echo server run the server by default with 2 threads in another terminal $ cd tokio-core $ cargo run --example=echo-threads --release $ target/release/examples/echo_client -t 2 -c 100 -l 100 -a 127.0.0.1:8080 ==================Benchmarking: 127.0.0.1:8080================== 100 clients, running 100 bytes, 10 sec. Speed: 315698 request/sec, 315698 response/sec, 30829 kb/sec Requests: 3156989 Responses: 3156989 target/release/examples/echo_client -t 2 -c 100 -l 100 -a 127.0.0.1:8080 1.89s user 13.46s system 152% cpu 10.035 total may echo ser

Performance and efficiency aren’t the same thing. Django does a lot of things other frameworks ranked here don’t do. Such framework rankings are also utterly irrelevant when you want something widely used enough to easily find contributors and integrations. That restricts you quite a bit more than “any so called framework that just handles http”. Did you even look at the top performers on that page? This is number 2: https://github.com/Xudong-Huang/may_minihttp