HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
yetmorecode
dos32a-ng
Assembly2023–2023
yetmorecode / dos32a-ng

dos32a-ng

2021 version of DOS/32A DOS Extender.

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
73GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

2021 version of DOS/32A DOS Extender.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-05-11 21:23:08 UTC to 2023-08-29 21:06:31 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 82023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 32023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsAug 28

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 82023-05-08 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC101
May 152023-05-15 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC000
May 222023-05-22 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC000
May 292023-05-29 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 52023-06-05 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 122023-06-12 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 192023-06-19 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 262023-06-26 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 32023-07-03 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 102023-07-10 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 172023-07-17 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 242023-07-24 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 312023-07-31 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 72023-08-07 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 142023-08-14 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 212023-08-21 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 282023-08-28 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-04 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

3 sources
The DOSBox wiki only provides a vague statement: > Once a game uses this, it is expected to run faster and better in DOSBox. The references on Wikipedia could shed some light https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS/32 The most concrete I've noticed is https://web.archive.org/web/20171224010653/http://dos32a.nar... > DOS/32 Advanced DOS Extender provides full compatibility with Watcom C/C++ and features one of the most complete software emulations of DOS/4GW, thus allowing the users to "plug" it into the protected mode programs which use DOS/4G, DOS/4GW, DOS/4GW Professional and any other compatible DOS Extenders without the need to modify a single line of code. > > DOS/32 Advanced DOS Extender has been designed to be fast, flexible and reliable. It features very fast mode translation and interrupt servicing, ability to configure
Read the rest
and bind the DOS Extender to applications, protected mode executable compression, support for allocation of up to 2 GB of memory, Null-pointer protection and more. There's also HTML docs in the repo: https://github.com/yetmorecode/dos32a-ng/tree/main/doc
In DOS/4GW made Windows 95 game compatibility easier, but with higher stakes

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.