HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Zerocoin
libzerocoin
C++2013–2017
Zerocoin / libzerocoin · Archived

libzerocoin

Zerocoin: C++ lib for anonymous extension to bitcoin

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
175GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Zerocoin: C++ lib for anonymous extension to bitcoin

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-07-05 04:44:49 UTC to 2017-02-18 18:25:54 UTC.

0122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Just to clarify, the code that was duplicated per denomination is not part of libzerocoin itself, it's in main.cpp. I'm not sure who wrote it; it may or may not have been part of the academic prototype Ian refers to. In any case, this amount of duplication (in security-critical code, no less) should never have passed the necessary code review to release a cryptocurrency. Also note that there are still unexplained differences between the copied code branches after the security fix. (In contrast, Zcash did have duplicated code in the prototype we inherited, but we rewrote that entirely well before the Zcash launch.) [Edit: I confirmed that the duplicated validation code in main.cpp was not present in libzerocoin. Some of the code in main.cpp including some stale comments, appears to have been pasted from https://github.com/Zerocoin/libzeroc
Read the rest
oin/blob/master/Tutorial... , but that tutorial code does not have the bug. So it appears that it was introduced by the Moneta/Zcoin developers.] Disclosure of interest: I am a Zcash developer.
In Zerocoin implementation bug
Apparently those are names for 50 and 100 BTC. From this presentation[1] or the source code[2]: 1 Lovelace = 1 Bitcoin 1 Goldwasser = 10 Bitcoin 1 Rackoff = 25 Bitcoin 1 Pedersen = 50 Bitcoin 1 Williamson = 100 Bitcoin But yes, those are meaningless names in themselves. Metric prefixes like "hectobitcoin" would be better. [1]: https://sar.informatik.hu-berlin.de/teaching/2013-w/2013-w%2... [2]: https://github.com/Zerocoin/libzerocoin/blob/master/Coin.h#L...
In Zerocoin implementation bug

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.