HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
zpao
spidernode
JavaScript2013–2016
zpao / spidernode · Archived

spidernode

A port of node.js using the SpiderMonkey JS engine instead of V8. [NO LONGER MAINTAINED]

10Distinct people
11Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
215GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A port of node.js using the SpiderMonkey JS engine instead of V8. [NO LONGER MAINTAINED]

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year11 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-03-28 14:52:27 UTC to 2016-01-20 07:54:29 UTC.

0123452013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

11 sources
I take it this is different from the NodeRED[0] thing IBM released a year or two ago? So, if node.js proper was closer to v8 HEAD, then they might find that the v8 team has recently been supportive of utilizing "precompiled scripts" (in v8 parlance). And I don't believe divorcing node from v8 is hard. Nobody is interested[1] (long term) in supporting such a divorce. For the most part, creating an API that would support both at the same time is maybe a month's worth of work at most. [0] https://gigaom.com/2013/09/27/meet-node-red-an-ibm-project-t... [1] https://github.com/zpao/spidernode
In Joyent Moves to Establish Node.js Foundation
"SpiderNode" [1] and "luvmonkey" [2] were two Node experiments using SpiderMonkey (from 2012). The first implemented V8's embedding API on top of SpiderMonkey. The second implemented libuv bindings in SpiderMonkey. Neither project was an official Mozilla project. Mozilla's SpiderMonkey team has (casually) discussed rebooting SpiderNode for server-side ES6 and asm.js support, but nothing is planned. [1] https://github.com/zpao/spidernode [2] https://github.com/creationix/luvmonkey
In Introducing Rec Room

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.