zsh-completions

Am i the only one who feels fish is not worth it despite of hype? Don't get me wrong. I think that fish is really good shell. BUT... After adding the following plugins to zsh(before you chime in, it's just adding these lines,not anything configuring much. also it auto bootstraps on new install), I found out that fish is no where as good as configured zsh. 1) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/zinit (plugin manager) 2) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlightin... 3) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/history-search-multi-wo... 4) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions 5) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions 6) https://github.com/Aloxaf/fzf-tab 7) any good shell prompt generator like https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k For example, I use fzf integration for tab completion. Fish's fzf integration

Zsh Completions is a pretty good alternative for anyone using zsh. https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions

Here's a tutorial on creating zsh completion scripts: https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions/blob/master/zsh... The zsh completion system is better than the bash one; it has a builtin menu system, or you can use fzf: https://github.com/junegunn/fzf

Very smooth, downloaded it and played around a bit. My first thought is why not use built-in shell autocompletion functions instead of redefining them in JS? Zsh completions are super powerful: https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions/blob/master/zsh... Typing `git a<TAB>` yields this in my terminal: ~ git add add -- add file contents to index am -- apply patches from a mailbox apply -- apply patch to files and/or to index archimport -- import an Arch repository into git archive -- create archive of files from named tree (btw, broken link at the bottom of this page: https://fig.io/docs/getting-started - https://fig.io/concepts/dynamic-suggestions should be https://fig.io/docs/concepts/dynamic-suggestions)

If you use zsh, you can use the help output to generate completions for your own scripts. https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions/blob/master/zsh...

Modern shells, such as bash or zsh, support specifying completion through external files or scripts that the shell can parse. Having never written one, I'm not familiar with the exacts, but suffice it to say the right file in the right location with the right contents can inform the shell as to how to auto complete. i.e., the auto-completion facilities are general / extensible. Especially if many programs follow a general format of program subcommand arg arg arg --optional-flag --option (my personal favorite, as I find it most clear; followed by e.g., argparse in Python, git, many GNU utilities) then it should be easy to see how a small specification of what subcommands take what for args or options should be enough to enable a pretty powerful auto-complete. (This is an example; I think zsh's autocompleters are actually small scripts;