HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
zuplo
rate-my-openapi
TypeScript2024–2024
zuplo / rate-my-openapi

rate-my-openapi

Find API quality and security issues via your OpenAPI spec

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
245GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Find API quality and security issues via your OpenAPI spec

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2024-08-14 10:03:32 UTC to 2024-08-14 20:42:20 UTC.

012024-08-14 10:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsAug 14, 10:002024-08-14 11:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-14 12:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-14 13:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-08-14 14:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-14 15:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsAug 14, 15:002024-08-14 16:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-14 17:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-14 19:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-14 20:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-14 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 14, 20:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 14, 10:002024-08-14 10:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 11:00:00 UTC110
Aug 14, 11:002024-08-14 11:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 12:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 12:002024-08-14 12:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 13:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 13:002024-08-14 13:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 14:00:00 UTC101
Aug 14, 14:002024-08-14 14:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 15:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 15:002024-08-14 15:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 16:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 16:002024-08-14 16:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 17:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 17:002024-08-14 17:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 18:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 18:002024-08-14 18:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 19:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 19:002024-08-14 19:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 20:00:00 UTC000
Aug 14, 20:002024-08-14 20:00:00 UTC2024-08-14 21:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
The LLM content seems distracting and unhelpful to me. In an example[1], three paragraphs start with "Oh boy" and "Oh dear". There are also "whopping 272 invalid schema examples" (twice), "whopping 334 rate limit responses", and a recommendation to "add rate limiting to a whopping 173 operations". The prompts[2] contain "You like chatting in a playful, and a somewhat snarky manner.", "Keep the tone casual and playful, and a bit snarky.", so this seems partly intentional. But even without the snark the AI summary looks unhelpful to me and I'd prefer a tool without LLM. So, Spectral[3] I guess. [1]: https://ratemyopenapi.com/report/31bae2fb-bda1-471b-8c1d-142... [2]: https://github.com/zuplo/rate-my-openapi/blob/0fcef3702592d8... [3]: https://github.com/stoplightio/spectral
In Show HN: We made a tool to help developers improve OpenAPI specs
This seems to be a fancy App/API surrounding Stoplight's Spectral library (https://docs.stoplight.io/docs/spectral/674b27b261c3c-overvi...), which is heavily relied upon (https://github.com/zuplo/rate-my-openapi/blob/main/apps/api/...) and not called out anywhere in the documentation. When I originally looked at it, I assumed that there was going to be some collaboration or other form of discussion tool to help others navigate your spec file and provide feedback. As it is, it doesn't feel like its adding the much value.
In Show HN: We made a tool to help developers improve OpenAPI specs

Show HN: We made a tool to help developers improve OpenAPI specs

Hey, I'm Martyn and I recently joined Zuplo. OpenAPI is a huge part of what we do, but getting a document up to scratch out of the gate, especially if you're not super well versed in the actual specification and what you should use and when. So we built a suite of tools to help with this called Rate My OpenAPI. It will score your OpenAPI document out of 100, as well as giving you individual scores in 4 key areas; completeness, SDK generation, security and documentation. Along with the score, you also get details of what the issues, or errors are, as well as guidance on what they actually mean and why they're important. We exposed the API for it using Zuplo, and then built a CLI, and a GitHub Action on top of that so that you can add Rate My OpenAPI into your workflow however you like. You can check it out and use all of this right now, fo
Read the rest
r free. I've already found it extremely useful and I hope you do to. Feedback is absolutely welcome!
105 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.